Monday, June 18, 2007

"This is an occasion for the (world's) 1.5 billion Muslims to look at the seriousness of this decision.


A Pakistani minister says Muslims would be right to launch suicide attacks over the Queen's decision to award Salman Rushdie a knighthood.Religious Affairs Minister Mohammed Ijaz ul Haq told parliament: "This is an occasion for the (world's) 1.5 billion Muslims to look at the seriousness of this decision.
"The West is accusing Muslims of extremism and terrorism. "If someone exploded a bomb on his body he would be right to do so unless the British government apologises and withdraws the 'sir'.

Officials in Pakistan say the knighthood is an insult to the religious sentiments of Muslims and should be withdrawn.
In Multan, effigies of the writer and the monarch have been burned by about 100 students carrying banners and chanting "Kill Him! Kill Him!"
Sir Salman caused outrage in the Islamic world with his book The Satanic Verses, which was accused of blaspheming the prophet Mohammed.


He was forced into hiding when an order to kill him - a fatwa - was issued and has only just returned to public life.


With thanks to Sky News

9 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:54 AM

    jaz-ul-Haq, the Religious Affairs Minister, told the assembly in Islamabad that the award of the knighthood excused suicide bombing. “If somebody has to attack by strapping bombs to his body to protect the honour of the Prophet then it is justified,”

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:43 AM

    Jesus discovered!

    http://www.wmctv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6680495&nav=menu59_2

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:17 AM

    What is terror for you guys???. Imagine you are 3 years old and trying to sleep in the night. You can't sleep as you hear the fighter jets flying above. You hear the carpet bombs clearing entire neighborhoods.Isn't that terror
    Wait a minute, I know you are going to tell me about 911 and the train stuff and the other WTC incident...etc. My friend in the history of this planet no other country has detonated even a fraction of the bombs that US has has detonated. YES my friend, to kill people, not ice cream bombs. There is no bigger nuclear threat to the world than US as its the only country which has used it against HUMANITY..my friend Japanese are human.. yes. Check it if you don't believe me. Do you believe in statistics or history to establish facts scientifically? If yes believe me that western world is a threat to human community. They have killed more people in the name of stopping other people killing people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So? Would you use the same argument to justify Mohamed ordering the killing of a 100-year old blind man and a woman suckling her baby, just because they composed poetry mocking him? Would you use the same argument to justify Mohamed raping a Jewish girl the same day he murdered her entire family? Would you use the same argument to justify Mohamed rushing home to have sex with a wife while she was tanning leather, just because he saw another woman and got horny? Would you use the same argument to justify Mohamed (aged 50+) thigh-raping a 6 year old girl and then genital-raping the same girl 3 years later?

    Who is worse? The USA or Mohamed, who claimed to be the messenger of the Almighty? Think about it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:16 PM

    Bakuru,
    Its not me justifying any killing or raping..you guys are doing that, just come out of the colonial box and think. I am talking about facts in front of us. You are talking about Mohamed who lived a thousand years back. You didn't see him I didn't see him ..all I know is he's got following which no one ever had. By looking at what his followers are doing its fact again, there is less rape among them, less theft among them, less cold blooded murder among them. Even when the world media tries to focus on their slightest mistake or deed. If a murder, rape or a theft takes place its common that we hear the complain that our religion is deteriorating in the imported customs and cultures. It clearly shows its not Islamic culture.
    Try to measure and judge things based on facts that you actually see .
    Again I want to remind you its not me trying to justify any killings. You are the one. Try and use your mind to analyze the situation. If you don't see my point your analytical power is low hence your judgments must be seriously flawed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous1:34 PM

    (His) sight never swerved, nor did it go wrong!

    18. For truly did he see, of the Signs of his Lord, the Greatest!

    19. Have ye seen Lat. and 'Uzza,

    20. And another, the third (goddess), Manat?

    21. What! for you the male sex, and for Him, the female?

    22. Behold, such would be indeed a division most unfair!


    Above are the verses in question...don't you agree that you need the verses before and the verses after to put in context?. again you said that Islam won't survive without censorship. Why didn't they change the verses for the controversy that was created even in the beginning?
    You must be blind and deaf bakuru. Don't you see all the censorship going around you. Don't you see the dodgy stuff getting sexed up from time to time that actually affect the fate, life and death of millions of people? Well I'm not asking you to come back to Islam, we don't need a prick like you.I'm just trying to tell you how stupid you are. Thats not leaving Islam bu the fact that you post this kind of stuff believing in them. The guys who write this kind of stuff against Islam, they know they are just spreading propaganda..they create the stuff you idiot..!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The person who now chooses to write here under the alias "Anonymous" said: “The guys who write this kind of stuff against Islam, they know they are just spreading propaganda..they create the stuff you idiot..!!”

    What kind of stuff against Islam? “The guys”, who are they? Now let us have a look at the facts.

    About Abu Afak’s murder please read the truth of what I said in Sirat Rasul Allah (The life of the prophet of Allah), by Ibn Ishaq, translated by Alfred Guillaume, page 675. This is also available in translation in Dhivehi. Also refer to Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, (Book of the Major Classes), by Ibn Sa'd. Translated by Moinul Haq, published by the Pakistan Historical Society, Page 31.

    About Asma bint Marwan refer also Sirat Rasul Allah pages 675-6. This is the oldest known and most reliable biography of Mohamed available.

    The circumstances of Mohamed having sex with Safiyah bint Huyayy bin el-Akhtab of the Banu Nadir is also related in Sirat Rasul Allah. Her husband, father and all her male relatives were murdered on Mohamed’s orders before Mohamed had sex with her.

    About Mohamed rushing home to have sex with his wife Zainab while she was tanning leather is in Sahih Muslim, Book 8 Hadith 3240.

    Now who are these “guys” that you say are spreading false propaganda against Islam? Who is the idiot?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:22 PM

    you see a different biography of Mohamed. I am talking about quran...sharia..tell me where quran allows rape ,tell me what sharia say about rape.thats islam not the stuff you propogate

    ReplyDelete