Thursday, February 28, 2008

Islam fails in producing thinkers

We always hear about the glorious days of Islam. About the great achievements of the Muslims (always in the past). The truth is another story. Read on...

FP: Tell us your thoughts on Muslim claims of accomplishments, revisionism and the expropriation of cultures and ideas.

BetBasoo: Let me preface my remarks by saying that I do not claim that Muslims have made no accomplishments. Individual Muslims have been successful in the full range of the human scientific and artistic endeavor. But a closer examination of these successes reveals that they came about because these individuals stepped outside of the Muslim realm. For example, today Muslim scientists and scholars are trained in the West. I claim that Islam is not conducive to the pursuit of rational inquiry, and when Islam asserts itself, it borrows, co-opts and ultimately, when time has passed and memory forgotten, claims that these borrowed and co-opted things were originated by Muslims, not by the native cultures that preceded the Muslims.

If something cannot be so expropriated, it is often destroyed. The most recent example was the Taliban's destruction of the 2500 year-old Buddhist statues in Afghanistan . In Iran , the UNESCO world heritage sites, Pasargadae and Persepolis , are threatened by the construction of the Sivand dam, and the Mullahs simply don't care, though they claim the water line will be below these cities, which date back to 560 B.C..

In Iraq , history text books teach that the Sumerians, Assyrians, Babylonians were in fact Arabs -- never mind that these civilizationsexisted a good 5600 years before Arabs/Muslims came into Mesopotamia .

In the Middle East it is nearly impossible to separate Islam from Arabs, they are two sides of the same coin. Hence, if you are an Arab, you must surely be a Muslim, and your accomplishments as well. If you are not a Muslim, then you need to be.

In India , over 3500 Hindu temples have been occupied and converted to Mosques, the most famous being the Taj Mahal. In Kosovo, under the auspices of the UN "peace" keeping force, over 600 Serbian churches and monasteries have been occupied or destroyed by the Muslim Kosovars. Kosovo is the most important religious center for the Serbians.

FP: So how about Muslim claims of accomplishment that aren’t real?

BetBasoo: Muslims claim many, many accomplishments we know they had nothing to do with. Arabic numerals? From India . The concept of zero? From Babylonia . Parabolic arches? From Assyria . The much ballyhooed claim of translating the Greek corpus of knowledge into Arabic? It was the Christian Assyrians, who first translated to Syriac, then to Arabic. The first University? Not Al-Azhar in Cairo (988 A.D.), but the School of Nisibis of the Church of the East (350 A.D.), which had three departments: Theology, Philosophy and Medicine. Al-Azhar only teaches Theology.

Speaking of medicine, Muslims will claim that medicine during the Golden Age of Islam, the Abbasid period, was the most advanced in the world. That is correct. But what they don't say is that the medical practitioners were exclusively Christians. The most famous medical family, the Bakhtishu family, Assyrians of the Church of the East, produced seven generations of doctors, who were the official physicians to the Caliphs of Baghdad for nearly 200 years.

There are many more examples, but I think these are enough to make the point.

FP: Why, in your view, does Islam fail in producing scholars and thinkers?

BetBasoo: It is a bold assertion to say that Islam fails in producing thinkers. Yet one is lead to this conclusion by a historical examination of Islamic civilizations. The putative "Golden Age of Islam", the Abbasid period, has been shown to be not the product of Muslims, but of their Christian subjects. In his book How Greek Science Passed to the Arabs, O'Leary's lists 22 scholars and translators during the Golden Age of Islam; 20 were Christians, 1 was a Persian, and 1 was a Muslim. This covers about a 250 year period. This "Golden Age", incidentally, came to an end after the Caliphs had forcefully converted enough Christians to Muslims (through the Jizya) that the Christian numbers fell below the critical threshold needed for sustaining the intellectual enterprise.

Given that this intellectual enterprise during the Abbasid period was the product of Christians, we ask the question: has there ever been an Islamic golden age? There was none during the rule of the Mamluks, who overthrew the Abbasids. Can we say the Ottomans, who followed the Mamluks, ever had a golden age?

In his book Religion of Peace, Robert Spencer has offered a penetrating and incisive analysis of why Islam fails to produce thinkers. His explanation is theological and theoretical. I will summarize it now and then give my own complimentary explanation, which is practical.

According to Robert Spencer, the Muslim god, Allah, is capricious. He is not subject to any laws and can, in fact, change laws arbitrarily without restraint. Quoting the Pope, Spencer says:

“for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality.”

Spencer continues:

"the Pope was not so much saying that in the Islamic view Allah would command his people to do evil, but that he might change the content of the concepts of good and evil. In other words, Allah would always enjoin “justice and kindness,” but what constitutes “justice and kindness,” just as what constitutes “innocent blood,” might change."

And

"He [Allah] was thus not bound to govern the universe according to consistent and observable laws. 'He cannot be questioned concerning what He does'" (Qur’an 21:23 ).

And

"Accordingly, there was no point to observing the workings of the physical world; there was no reason to expect that any pattern to its workings would be consistent, or even discernable. If Allah could not be counted on to be consistent, why waste time observing the order of things? It could change tomorrow. Stanley Jaki, a Catholic priest and physicist, explains that it was al-Ghazali, the philosopher that the authors of the Open Letter recommend to the Pope, who 'denounced natural laws, the very objective of science, as a blasphemous constraint upon the free will of Allah.' He adds that 'Muslim mystics decried the notion of scientific law (as formulated by Aristotle) as blasphemous and irrational, depriving as it does the Creator of his freedom.' Social scientist Rodney Stark adds that 'it would seem that Islam has a conception of God appropriate to underwrite the rise of science. Not so. Allah is not presented as a lawful creator but is conceived of as an extremely active God who intrudes in the world as he deems it appropriate. This prompted the formation of a major theological bloc within Islam that condemns all efforts to formulate natural laws as blasphemy in that they deny Allah’s freedom to act.'"

Thus there is no incentive for Muslims to pursue rational inquiry, since any results obtained can be invalidated by Allah at his whim.



For full article go to FrontpageMag

9 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:11 AM

    Fails in producing thinkers? you are kidding right?

    What about NASS? One of the greatest thinkers and guess what? He is a muslim!

    Doesnt produce thinkers he say!!

    Rock these people NASS!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nass is a thinker. He thinks Ismail is a Christian missionary!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adam,
    Nass is not thinking. He is "fantasizing" I am a Christian missionary.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A Nony Mouse9:23 PM

    I think it is incorrect to say that Islam didn't produce any great thinkers or made any original contributions. Knowledge is always advanced by building on what was done before. As such Islamic/Arabic thinkers also had to learn from Greek, Indian, etc.

    What is true, however is that Islam then (Umayyids/Abbasids) was very different to what Islam has become now. There were important Islamic philosophers back then who argued for separation of spiritualism and rational inquiry. They argued that all worldly problems must be met with rationality. It was in this mindset that Islamic thinkers developed.

    Later the victory of the literalists like Al-Gazali over these thinkers lead to the down fall and ruin of the Islamic civilization. Worryingly we are seeing this trend in the Western world were Christian literalists seek to over throw rationality. Let's hope that they do not win this round.

    Just because we don't like a religion doesn't mean we have to deny the past accomplishments. And like I said Islam today is not what it was then. Today's Muslims will probably consider those guys are heretics or worse.

    So let's give credit where credit is due. People of all religions made important contributions. Most of the contributions have been lost and later discovered independently by others. We don't need religion in this day and age. However we must not forget the past or deny whatever had happened.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:31 PM

    There is definately a lot to find out about this subject.
    I love all of the points you've made.
    My web-site :: Photo decals

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:26 PM

    Howdy this is kind of of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with
    HTML. I'm starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!
    Have a look at my site - premiership transfer news chelsea

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous6:32 AM

    We're a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with valuable information to work on. You've done an impressive job and
    our whole community will be thankful to you.
    My web site ... soccer transfer news espn

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:28 AM

    Great blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from
    somewhere? A design like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my
    blog shine. Please let me know where you got your theme.
    Thank you
    My web site - transfer rumours chelsea latest

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous5:06 PM

    I'm gone to convey my little brother, that he should also pay a quick visit this weblog on regular basis to take updated from newest news update.
    Also see my webpage - colon cleanse burlington vt

    ReplyDelete